13 Chap. L. Rev. 449 (No PDF) Chapman Law Review Winter 2010 Case Digest DIGEST: SCHATZ V. ALLEN MATKINS LECK GAMBLE AND MALLORY LLP Kasey C. Phillips Copyright (c) 2010 Chapman Law Review; Kasey C. Phillips Opinion by Moreno, J., expressing the unanimous view of the court. Issue Does the…

13 Chap. L. Rev. 445 (No PDF) Chapman Law Review Winter 2010 Case Digest DIGEST: MUSAELIAN V. ADAMS Julie Sarto Copyright (c) 2010 Chapman Law Review; Julie Sarto Opinion by Werdegar, J., expressing the unanimous view of the court. Issue Under California Code of Civil Procedure section 128.7 [tippy title="1" header="off"]Cal.…

13 Chap. L. Rev. 441 (No PDF) Chapman Law Review Winter 2010 Case Digest DIGEST: IN RE JOSE C. Megan Krebbeks Copyright (c) 2010 Chapman Law Review; Megan Krebbeks Opinion by Werdegar, J., with George, C.J., Kennard, J., Baxter, J., Chin, J., Moreno, J., and Corrigan, J. Issue Whether the…

13 Chap. L. Rev. 417 (No PDF) Chapman Law Review Winter 2010 Comment ONE STEP AT A TIME: REFORMING DRUG DIVERSION PROGRAMS IN CALIFORNIA Megan N. Krebbeks [tippy title="*" header="off"]J.D. Candidate 2010, Chapman University School of Law; B.A. 2007, University of Rochester. I would like to thank my parents, John and…

13 Chap. L. Rev. 391 (No PDF) Chapman Law Review Winter 2010 Comment RECOGNIZING AND REGULATING HOME SCHOOLING IN CALIFORNIA: BALANCING PARENTAL AND STATE INTERESTS IN EDUCATION Paul A. Alarcón [tippy title="*" header="off"]J.D. Candidate 2010, Chapman University School of Law; B.A. 2007, Thomas Aquinas College. Prospective Law Clerk to the Honorable…

13 Chap. L. Rev. 357 (No PDF) Chapman Law Review Winter 2010 Article THE “CALIFORNIA EFFECT” & THE FUTURE OF AMERICAN FOOD: HOW CALIFORNIA’S GROWING CRACKDOWN ON FOOD & AGRICULTURE HARMS THE STATE & THE NATION Baylen J. Linnekin [tippy title="*" header="off"]LL.M. candidate, Agricultural & Food Law, University of Arkansas. J.D.,…

13 Chap. L. Rev. 307 (No PDF) Chapman Law Review Winter 2010 Article TIME TO BURY THE SHOCKS THE CONSCIENCE TEST Rosalie Berger Levinson [tippy title="*" header="off"]Phyllis and Richard Duesenberg Professor of Law, Valparaiso University School of Law.[/tippy] Copyright (c) 2010 Chapman Law Review; Rosalie Berger Levinson The Supreme Court has…

13 Chap. L. Rev. 297 (No PDF) Chapman Law Review Winter 2010 Article CRYING OVER THE INFERRED EXISTENCE OF SPILLED MILK: THE DEMONSTRABLE ILLOGIC OF ORTEGA V. KMART Paul K. Hoffman [tippy title="*" header="off"]Attorney; Adjunct Professor of Law, Trinity Law School; B.A. in Economics, Westmont College; J.D., University of California at…

13 Chap. L. Rev. 265 (No PDF) Chapman Law Review Winter 2010 Article A CATASTROPHIC CONUNDRUM, BUT NOT A NUISANCE: WHY THE JUDICIAL BRANCH IS ILL-SUITED TO SET EMISSIONS RESTRICTIONS ON DOMESTIC ENERGY PRODUCERS THROUGH THE COMMON LAW NUISANCE DOCTRINE Matthew Hall [tippy title="*" header="off"]Riggs, Abney, Neal, Turpen, Orbison & Lewis,…

13 Chap. L. Rev. 249 (No PDF) Chapman Law Review Winter 2010 Article COMPARING PHILOSOPHIES AND PRACTICES OF FAMILY LAW BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND OTHER NATIONS: THE FLINTSTONES [tippy title="*" header="off"]Trademarked Hanna-Barbera Productions, Inc.[/tippy] VS. THE JETSONS [tippy title="**" header="off"]Trademarked Hanna-Barbera Productions, Inc.[/tippy] Marsha B. Freeman [tippy title="***" header="off"]Professor of Law, Barry…