10 Chap. L. Rev. 551 (No PDF) Chapman Law Review Spring 2007 Articles DOES MIRANDA PROTECT THE INNOCENT OR THE GUILTY? Steven B. Duke [tippy title="*" header="off"]Professor of Law, Yale Law School. This article is an elaboration of remarks made at the Chapman Law Review Symposium: Miranda at 40: Applications in…

10 Chap. L. Rev. 539 (No PDF) Chapman Law Review Spring 2007 Symposium Introduction A REPUBLIC, IF YOU CAN KEEP IT Address by the Honorable Edwin A. Meese III [tippy title="*" header="off"]United States Attorney General, 1985-1988; Ronald Reagan Distinguished Fellow in Public Policy and Chairman of the Center for Legal and…

10 Chap. L. Rev. 531 (No PDF) Chapman Law Review Spring 2007 Symposium Introduction MIRANDA AT 40: APPLICATIONS IN A POST-ENRON, POST-9/11 WORLD Donald J. Kochan [tippy title="*" header="off"]Associate Professor of Law, Chapman University School of Law; and Faculty Advisor to the Chapman Law Review. Recognition should be made to Professor…

10 Chap. L. Rev. 501 Chapman Law Review Winter 2006 Comments THE SUPREME COURT AND THE PRESIDENT: TOWARD A BALANCING TEST WITH BITE Pooya Safarzadeh [tippy title="*" header="off"]J.D. Candidate 2007, Chapman University School of Law; B.A. 2003, University of California, Berkeley. I would like to thank Professor Celestine McConville for her…

10 Chap. L. Rev. 391 Chapman Law Review Winter 2006 Articles THE IMPORTANCE OF SELECTIVE FEDERAL PREEMPTION IN THE U.S. SECURITIES REGULATORY FRAMEWORK: A LESSON FROM CANADA, OUR NEIGHBOR TO THE NORTH Cheryl Nichols [tippy title="*" header="off"]Assistant Professor of Law, Howard University School of Law. J.D., Georgia State University; M.B.A., University…

10 Chap. L. Rev. 359 Chapman Law Review Winter 2006 Articles EVOLUTION, SCIENCE, AND IDEOLOGY: WHY THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE REQUIRES NEUTRALITY IN SCIENCE CLASSES Stephen W. Trask [tippy title="*" header="off"]J.D. 2006, William Mitchell College of Law; B.S. 2003, Liberty University. I would like to thank Professor Russell Pannier, Jeremy Samek, and…

10 Chap. L. Rev. 299 Chapman Law Review Winter 2006 Articles RELIGION, POLITICS, AND THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE: DOES GOD BELONG IN AMERICAN PUBLIC LIFE? L. Scott Smith [tippy title="*" header="off"]B.A., University of Texas (Austin); M.Div., Austin Presbyterian Theological Seminary; Ph.D., Columbia University (New York); J.D., Texas Tech University.[/tippy] Copyright (c) 2006…

10 Chap. L. Rev. 257 Chapman Law Review Winter 2006 Articles TRADEMARKS AND GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS: A CASE OF CALIFORNIA CHAMPAGNE Deborah J. Kemp [tippy title="*" header="off"]Professor of Business Law, Craig Faculty Fellow, Craig School of Business, California State University, Fresno. J.D. 1981, University of Florida School of Law.[/tippy] Lynn M. Forsythe [tippy…

10 Chap. L. Rev. 235 Chapman Law Review Fall 2006 Appendix A BIBLIOGRAPHY OF SOURCES ON “PUBLIC USE” IN EMINENT DOMAIN Lauren A. Wiggins [tippy title="*" header="off"]First Year Law Student, U.C. Davis School of Law.[/tippy] Timothy Sandefur [tippy title="**" header="off"]Staff Attorney, Pacific Legal Foundation. J.D. 2002, Chapman University School of Law; B.A.…

10 Chap. L. Rev. 187 (No PDF) Chapman Law Review Fall 2006 Article A MATTER OF RHETORIC: THE DIVERSITY RATIONALE IN POLITICAL CONTEXT Daniel Ibsen Morales [tippy title="*" header="off"]Associate, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, J.D. Yale Law School, B.A. Williams College. The views expressed herein are solely my own and do not…